4.4 Article

A binary-medium-based constitutive model for geological materials based on the statistical meso-breakage concept and mean-field homogenization

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2022.2136763

关键词

Geomaterial; constitutive model; binary-medium model; homogenization theory; meso-breakage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on studying the inelastic responses of geological materials using a binary-medium-based constitutive model. The progressive transformation of the bonded medium into the frictional medium is considered to understand the evolution of meso-structure upon loading. The double-inclusion model is used to analyze the interactions between inclusions and the matrix, taking into account the varying breakage ratio. The proposed model successfully reproduces the typical behaviors of cemented/structured geomaterials.
This paper is devoted to determining the inelastic responses of geological materials by the binary-medium-based constitutive model. The geomaterials are conceptualized as two-phase composites that are composed of the bonded medium of elastic-brittle nature and the frictional medium of elastoplastic nature. The evolution of meso-structure upon loading is considered by the progressive transformation of the bonded medium into the frictional medium. By introducing the statistical meso-breakage concept, the breakage ratio indicating the degree of such transformation is determined by statistical approaches. The interactions among inclusions (the bonded medium) and matrix (the frictional medium) and the influence of the varying breakage ratio are considered with the help of the double-inclusion model within the framework of the mean-field homogenization scheme. An application is presented for the structured/bonding geomaterials based on the proposed model. The comparisons between computed results and experimental data of three kinds of structured soils show that the proposed model can reproduce the typical behaviors of cemented/structured geomaterials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据