Assessing government policies' impact on the COVID-19 pandemic and elderly deaths in East Asia

This study assesses governments' long-term non-pharmaceutical interventions upon the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in East Asia. It advances the literature towards a better understanding of when and which control measures are effective. We (1) provide time-varying case fatality ratios and focus on the elderly's mortality and case fatality ratios, (2) measure the correlations between daily new cases (daily new deaths) and each index based on multiple domestic pandemic waves and (3) examine the lead-lag relationship between daily new cases (daily new deaths) and each index via the cross-correlation functions on the pre-whitened series. Our results show that the interventions reduce COVID-19 infections for some periods before the period of the Omicron variant. Moreover, there is no COVID-19 policy lag in Taiwan between daily new confirmed cases and each index. As of March 2022, the case fatality ratios of the elderly group in Japan, Hong Kong and South Korea are 4.69%, 4.72% and 1.48%, respectively, while the case fatality ratio of the elderly group in Taiwan is 25.01%. A government's COVID-19 vaccination distribution and prioritisation policies are pivotal for the elderly group to reduce the number of deaths. Immunising this specific group as best as possible should undoubtedly be a top priority.

Automated summary

This study assesses the effectiveness of long-term non-pharmaceutical interventions implemented by governments in East Asia during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings indicate that these interventions have reduced COVID-19 infections before the emergence of the Omicron variant. Additionally, Taiwan does not exhibit a policy lag between daily new confirmed cases and government interventions. The case fatality ratios for the elderly population are relatively low in Japan, Hong Kong, and South Korea, but high in Taiwan.