4.7 Article

Environmental factors and its influence on human health in BRICS: implications for human development

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 22509-22519

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-23678-2

关键词

Environmental factors; Human health; ARDL-PMG; BRICS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BRICS economies are facing severe environmental issues that affect human health. The study finds that CO2 emissions have a negative impact on life expectancy, but a positive impact on the death rate. Environmental innovations and environmental policy stringency have positive effects on life expectancy, but the effect is insignificant for the death rate. The study suggests that the BRICS economies should reassess their environmental policies for the betterment of human health.
BRICS economies are facing severe environmental issues that exert a detrimental impact on human health. The analysis intends to examine the impact of CO2 emissions, environmental policy stringency, and environmental innovations on health outcomes for the BRICS economies. The long-run results of the ARDL-PMG infer that CO2 has a significant negative in the life expectancy model while it has a significant positive in the death rate model. These findings imply that the rise in CO2 emissions reduces life expectancy and increases the death rate in BRICS economies. On the other side, the estimates of environmental innovation and environmental policy stringency are positively significant in the life expectancy model; however, in the death rate model, the estimate of environmental innovation is insignificant, and environmental policy stringency is negatively significant in the death rate model. In a nutshell, the findings imply that CO2 emissions exacerbate health problems, environmental innovations, and environmental policy stringency, improving the health status of the people. Our findings suggest that the BRICS economies should revisit their environmental policies for the betterment of human health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据