4.7 Article

Arsenite and arsenate toxicity in the earthworm Eisenia andrei (Bouche 1972) in natural soil and tropical artificial soil

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 12872-12882

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-23025-5

关键词

Arsenic; Earthworms; Soil ecotoxicology; Chemical speciation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The toxicity of arsenite and arsenate on Californian earthworms was evaluated, with arsenite showing a greater impact and causing increased activity of antioxidant enzymes and enzymes related to glutathione metabolism.
Inorganic forms of As (arsenite - As(III) and arsenate - As(V)) are prevalent in soil and recognized for their high toxicity. Once in the soil, these forms of As can compromise key organisms for ecological processes, such as earthworms. The aim of the study was to evaluate the toxicity of arsenite and arsenate in the Californian earthworm Eisenia andrei exposed in natural soil and tropical artificial soil (TAS). Adverse effects were evaluated using avoidance test, acute toxicity test, and a sublethal concentration test to assess biochemical parameters. LC50 values for arsenite were 21.27 mg/kg in natural soil and 19.0 mg/kg in TAS and for arsenate were 76.18 mg/kg in natural soil and above 120 mg/kg in TAS. In the avoidance test, this behavior was shown to be significantly higher in the natural soil and for earthworms exposed to arsenite, while total antioxidant capacity, glutathione levels, lipid damage, and DNA damage were significantly higher in animals exposed to arsenite, but without differences in relation to the two types of soil tested. Animals exposed to As(V) showed increased activity of enzymes related to glutathione metabolism. The results obtained in the present study show the impact of As exposure on the health of the Californian earthworm E. andrei, especially in the form of arsenite, and alert the public authorities that legal limits should, whenever possible, consider the soil properties and also the different chemical species of the contaminants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据