An Integrated Approach for Determination of Total Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)

Per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are difficult to analyze in environmental media due challenges such as extraction recovery and lack of analytical standards. The total oxidizable precursor (TOP) assay and suspect screening analysis coupled with semiquantitative (SQ) concentration estimates are two approaches to assess total PFAS in environmental media, but studies are needed to optimize workstreams for total PFAS analysis. This study applied two soil extraction methods, TOP assay, and SQ analysis to three aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) and three AFFF-impacted soils. In soils, the total PFAS estimated with results from an extraction method utilizing sequential acidic and basic solvents led to a 35% increase in precursors during TOP assay relative to results from a basic solvent only extraction in one of three soils tested, but concentrations did not increase significantly in remaining soils. Furthermore, sample specific dilution schemes were required to overcome matrix effects caused by the acidic extraction step that influenced estimates of total PFAS by SQ analysis. The results highlight that there is not an advantage to routine application of an acid extraction step in PFAS-impacted soils. In three AFFFs, suspect screening of post-TOP samples identified eight classes of PFAS present after oxidation. Concentrations of three classes increased, suggesting they are new TOP end points. Concentrations of the remaining five classes either remained constant after TOP or exhibited slight decreases. As a result, combined TOP and SQ workstreams may yield the most representative assessment of total PFAS composition and concentration. The eight classes of PFAS present after TOP did not degrade in harsh conditions. Some are structurally similar to PFCAs and PFSAs and are known to occur in the environment, suggesting a similar degree of persistence and a need for more routine monitoring.

Automated summary

This study evaluated AFFF and AFFF-impacted soils using two soil extraction methods, TOP assay, and SQ analysis. The results suggest that routine application of an acid extraction step in PFAS-impacted soils does not provide advantages. Suspect screening analysis of post-TOP samples identified eight classes of PFAS, some of which may have persistence in the environment and require more routine monitoring.