4.8 Article

Ligand-Enabled Donnan Dialysis for Phosphorus Recovery from Alum-Laden Waste Activated Sludge

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c02153

关键词

Donnan dialysis; nutrients; resource recovery; phosphorus; ion exchange; circular economy; Donnan dialysis; nutrients; resource recovery; phosphorus; ion exchange; circular economy

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [1706819]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1706819] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While many technologies focus on recovering nutrients from liquid waste, this study introduces a new ligand-enabled Donnan dialysis process for effective phosphorus recovery from solid waste.
While many nutrient recovery technologies target liquid waste streams, new strategies are required for effective phosphorus recovery from solid waste. This study reports an innovative ligand-enabled Donnan dialysis process to recover orthophosphate (P(V)) from alum-laden waste activated sludge (WAS). Four ligands, namely acetate, citrate, ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), and oxalate, were evaluated for P(V) release from a synthetic sludge containing 5 mM P(V) and 25 mM Al(III) and a real, alum-laden WAS with similar contents. Citrate and EDTA released more than 95% of P(V) at doses of 30 mM, outperforming acetate and oxalate. The ligand-based solubilization strategy was coupled with Donnan dialysis to recover P(V) into a clean sodium chloride draw solution. After Donnan dialysis with the synthetic sludge, the P(V) recovery's order was as follows: EDTA (54.4%) > citrate (41.7%) > oxalate (4.3%). The P(V) recovery efficiencies were slightly lower for Donnan dialysis with real, alum-laden WAS, namely 45.1% and 25.2% for EDTA and citrate addition, respectively, due to competitive effects exerted by other dissolved species. These promising results successfully demonstrated the proof-of-concept for ligand-enabled Donnan dialysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据