4.7 Review

Adapting critical infrastructure to climate change: A scoping review

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
卷 135, 期 -, 页码 67-76

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.04.015

关键词

Critical infrastructure; Climate change adaptation; Typology; Relationships; Physical infrastructure; Soft infrastructure; Land use planning; Asset management

资金

  1. Australian Government
  2. Australian Research Council [FT180100652]
  3. Australian Research Council [FT180100652] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the relationship between critical infrastructure and climate change, proposes an outcomes-based definition for adaptive critical infrastructure, and analyzes how the focus and adaptation methods affect the adaptation outcomes.
Critical infrastructure is a foundational component of a functional society and is under threat from the impacts of climate change. To ensure communities are not left without fundamental supplies and services, the adaptation of critical infrastructure to climate change needs to be understood holistically. This paper uses a scoping literature review to investigate the relationship between critical infrastructure and climate change. In the absence of a common definition for adaptive critical infrastructure, an outcomes-based definition is proposed that captures the four types of critical infrastructure: physical, ecological, institutional and cultural. A typology was developed to critically interrogate the focus of adaptive critical infrastructure. It shows that the focus across elements such as conceptualisation and management ranges from tangible to intangible infrastructure, and from positivist to interpretivist in approach. The literature review identified relationship-building as a key management objective across the spectrums. The typology contributes knowledge on how the choice of infrastructure focus and adaptation methods influences adaptation outcomes and path dependencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据