4.7 Article

Future changes and seasonal variability of the directional wave spectra in the Mediterranean Sea for the 21st century

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 17, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8ec4

关键词

directional wave spectra; Mediterranean; future changes; climate change; multimodal

资金

  1. University of Genoa (UniGE)
  2. Compagnia San Paolo Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a state-of-the-art assessment of future directional wave spectra in the Mediterranean Sea. It shows a decrease in the predominant wave systems and a likely decrease in significant wave height, but an increase in other less energetic frequencies and directions, leading to a bimodal/multimodal wave climate. These changes have significant implications for coastal assets and port operations.
A state-of-the-art regional assessment of future directional wave spectra in the Mediterranean Sea and the projected changes with respect to hindcast is presented. A multi-model EURO-CORDEX regional ensemble of bias-adjusted wave climate projections in eleven locations of the Mediterranean are used for the assessment of future seasonal changes in the directional wave spectra under the high-emission scenario RCP8.5. This analysis allows us to identify climate change effects on the spectral energy of the swell and wind-sea systems and their seasonal variability which cannot be captured with the standard integrated wave parameters, such as significant wave height and mean wave direction. The results show an overall robust decrease in the predominant wave systems, resulting in a likely decrease in the significant wave height that is in agreement with previous studies. However, the results depict a robust increase in other less energetic frequencies and directions leading to a projected behavioral change from unimodal to bimodal/multimodal wave climate in many locations which has strong repercussions on the vulnerability of coastal assets and ports operability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据