4.7 Article

Anaerobic digestion of thickened waste activated sludge under calcium hypochlorite stress: Performance stability and microbial communities

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113441

关键词

Waste activated sludge; Calcium hypochlorite; Anaerobic sequencing batch reactor; Microbial community

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. NSERC Discovery project
  3. Canada Research Chair (CRC) in Future Community Water Services
  4. Alberta Innovates Clean Technology Facilities Support Program
  5. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypochlorite pretreatment has been proven effective in enhancing waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion performances. This study compared the performance stability and resilience of digested sludge pretreated with 1% hypochlorite and untreated sludge. The results showed that hypochlorite pretreatment improved the digestion of sludge and increased the interactions within the microbial community.
Hypochlorite pretreatment has been proven effective in enhancing waste activated sludge (WAS) anaerobic digestion performances recently. In this study, two semi-continuous anaerobic sequencing batch reactors (ASBRs), one fed with Ca(ClO)(2) pretreated thickened WAS (TWAS) and one with raw TWAS, were operated at mesophilic conditions (35 degrees C) for 145 days. Three loading shocks were introduced to each reactor to compare the performance stability and resilience between the digestion of Ca(ClO)(2) pretreated TWAS and untreated TWAS. Microbial community shifts were quantified to reveal the microbiome responses to disturbances. The results suggested that 1% Ca(ClO)(2) enhanced the digestion of TWAS by inactivating and transforming the biomass to more easily digested substrates. Co-occurrence network analysis revealed that the strongest interactions in the microbial community occurred in the steady state of TWAS anaerobic digestion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据