4.7 Article

Use of historical mapping to understand sources of soil-lead contamination: Case study of Santa Ana, CA

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113478

关键词

Lead; History; Environmental justice; Soil contamination; Traffic emissions; Heavy metal; Leaded gasoline

资金

  1. Ridge to Reef Graduate Training Program - NSF-NRT [DGE-1735040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the historical sources of soil-lead contamination in Santa Ana, California. It utilizes geo-spatial data and historical research methods to identify leaded gasoline as the primary contributor to soil-lead, and offers recommendations for community-level remediation strategies.
This paper investigates the historical sources of soil-lead contamination in Santa Ana, California. Even though dangerous levels of soil-lead have been found in a wide variety of communities across the United States, public health institutions lack clarity on the historical origins of these crises. This study uses geo-spatial data collected through archival research to estimate the impact of two potential sources of lead contamination in the past - lead-paint and leaded gasoline. It examines, through a combination of statistical and historical methods, the association between lead concentrations in contemporary soil samples and patterns in the evolution of the city's physical features, such as the growth of urbanized areas and the historical flow of traffic. We emphasize the value of historical data collected through archival research for understanding the sources of environmental lead, particularly leaded gasoline, which our study found to be the most likely and most prominent contributor to soillead in Santa Ana's environment. This research contributes to environmental-justice advocacy efforts to reframe lead poisoning as a systemic environmental issue and outlines the path forward to community-level remediation strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据