4.6 Article

Liquefaction prediction with robust machine learning algorithms (SVM, RF, and XGBoost) supported by genetic algorithm-based feature selection and parameter optimization from the perspective of data processing

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
卷 81, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-022-10578-4

关键词

Liquefaction prediction; SMOTE; Genetic algorithm; Imbalanced data; Parameter optimization; XGBoost

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper applies three robust machine learning algorithms to predict soil liquefaction and improves the accuracy of the prediction models using feature selection and parameter optimization. The results show that the XGBoost model has the highest accuracy when using the SMOTE algorithm.
Liquefaction prediction is an important issue in the seismic design of engineering structures, and research on this topic has been continuing in current literature using different methods, including experimental, numerical, or soft computing. In this paper, three robust machine learning (ML) algorithms are applied to predict soil liquefaction using a set of 411 shear wave velocity case records. The Genetic Algorithm (GA) based feature selection (FS) and parameter optimization of Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms are utilized to improve the accuracy of the liquefaction prediction models. Simple Random Sampling (SRS) and Stratified Random Sampling (StrRS) are used for data sampling, and also SMOTE algorithm are applied to prepare the balanced training sets. The results of robust ML algorithms are assessed based on well-known five performance matrices, namely Accuracy (Acc), Kappa, Precision, Recall, and F-Measure. Evaluation of the results is made separately for each ML algorithm considering sampling data generated from SRS, StrRS, and SMOTE. As a result, the XGBoost model is more accurate (Acc = 96%) than RF (Acc = 93%) and SVM (Acc = 91%) in the case of the SMOTE algorithm. This study reveals the superiority of the XGBoost algorithm in the liquefaction prediction and shows how the accuracy measures tend to improve when the predictive models are trained using balanced samples with StrRS and SMOTE sampling strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据