4.7 Article

An environmental fairness based optimisation model for the decision-support of joint control over the water quantity and quality of a river basin

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 535, 期 -, 页码 366-376

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.051

关键词

Environmental fairness; Joint control; Water quantity and quality; Environmental Gini coefficient; WASP; Songhua River basin

资金

  1. Program for China National Funds for Excellent Young Scientists [51422903]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presented a new environmental fairness based optimisation model (EFOM) for the decision support of water resources management and water pollution control at the watershed scale. The model integrated three prediction modules for water consumption and pollutant discharge (WCPD), environmental Gini coefficient (EGC) and water quality (WASP). The model is capable of optimizing the total discharge quantity in the whole basin and controlling units both spatially and temporally, and addressing the conflicts between environmental fairness and efficiency. The model was applied to the Songhua River basin, attempting to support decision-making of joint control over the water quantity and quality. Validation of the WASP module showed that the simulation agreed well with water quality monitoring values (2013) in the Harbin section. Results from the EFOM model also indicated that the water environment in the Harbin section would be improved significantly by effectively controlling the total pollution discharge. The identified optimal strategy obtained from the EFOM showed that the percentage of water in good quality reaches 72% in 2020, suggesting that the strategy would guarantee the planning goals of The China Action Plan for Water Pollution Control to be satisfied. Hence, the modelling under the consideration of environmental fairness can be a new attempt, which is beneficial to optimal joint control of water quantity and water quality at the watershed scale. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据