4.8 Article

Organic-Inorganic Perovskite Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells with a Large Capacitance

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 25, 期 46, 页码 7226-7232

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201502962

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61574014, 11474017, 21174016, 60776039]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120009110031]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2013JBZ004, 2013JBM102]
  4. General Research Fund [HKU711813]
  5. Collaborative Research Fund from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [CUHK1/CRF/12G, C7045-14E]
  6. CAS-Croucher Funding Scheme for Joint Laboratories [CAS14601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While perovskite light-emitting diodes typically made with high work function anodes and low work function cathodes have recently gained intense interests. Perovskite light-emitting devices with two high work function electrodes with interesting features are demonstrated here. Firstly, electroluminescence can be easily obtained from both forward and reverse biases. Secondly, the results of impedance spectroscopy indicate that the ionic conductivity in the iodide perovskite (CH3 NH3PbI3) is large with a value of approximate to 10(-8) S cm(-1). Thirdly, the shift of the emission spectrum in the mixed halide perovskite (CH3NH3PbI3-Br-x(x)) light-emitting devices indicates that I(-)ions are mobile in the perovskites. Fourthly, this work shows that the accumulated ions at the interfaces result in a large capacitance (approximate to 100 mu F cm(-2)). The above results conclusively prove that the organic-inorganic halide perovskites are solid electrolytes with mixed ionic and electronic conductivity and the light-emitting device is a light-emitting electrochemical cell. The work also suggests that the organic-inorganic halide perovskites are potential energy-storage materials, which may be applicable in the field of solid-state supercapacitors and batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据