4.7 Article

The use of AQUATOOL DSS applied to the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Water (SEEAW)

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 533, 期 -, 页码 1-14

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.034

关键词

Water accounts; System of Environmental-Economic; Accounting for Water (SEEAW); AQUATOOL; Water resources systems

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CGL2012-34978]
  2. European Community [308438, 07.0329/2013/671291/SUB/ENV.C.1, LIFE12 ENV/ES/000685, 641811]
  3. Andalusian Government [RNM-308]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, water accounts are one of the next steps to be implemented in European River Basin Management Plans. Building water accounts is a complex task, mainly due to the lack of common European definitions and procedures. For their development, when data is not systematically measured, simulation models and estimations are necessary. The main idea of this paper is to present a new approach which enables the combined use of hydrological models and water resources models developed with AQUATOOL Decision Support System (DSS) to fill in the physical water supply and use tables and the asset accounts presented in the System of Economic and Environmental Accounts for Water (SEEAW). The case study is the Velez River Basin, located in the southern part of the Iberian Peninsula in Spain. In addition to obtaining the physical water supply and use tables and the asset accounts in this river basin, we present here the indicators as a result thereof. These indicators cover many critical aspects of water management, showing a general description of the river basin and allowing decision-makers to characterise the pressures on water resources. As a general conclusion, the union of AQUATOOL DSS and SEEAW will provide more complete information to decision-makers and it enables to introduce these methodological decisions in order to guarantee consistency and comparability of the results between different river basins. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据