4.6 Article

Approximation of Composition and Temperature Dependent Heat Conductivity and Optimization of Thermoelectric Energy Conversion in Silicon-Germanium Alloys

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e24101397

关键词

composition graded materials; silicon-germanium alloys; composition-dependent heat conductivity; efficiency of thermoelectric systems; minimum of energy dissipated

资金

  1. University of Basilicata (RIL 2020)
  2. University of Messina (FFABR Unime 2020)
  3. Italian National Group of Mathematical Physics (GNFM-INdAM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes the efficiency of a silicon-germanium alloy as a thermoelectric energy converter, taking into account the influence of composition and temperature on thermal conductivity. The dependency on composition is determined using a non-linear regression method, while the dependency on temperature is approximated through a first-order expansion. The differences from the case of thermal conductivity depending solely on composition are highlighted. The efficiency of the system is analyzed based on the assumption that optimal energy conversion corresponds to the minimum rate of energy dissipation, and the composition and temperature values that minimize this rate are calculated.
We analyze the efficiency as thermoelectric energy converter of a silicon-germanium alloy with composition and temperature dependent heat conductivity. The dependency on composition is determined by a non-linear regression method (NLRM), while the dependency on temperature is approximated by a first-order expansion in the neighborhood of three reference temperatures. The differences with respect to the case of thermal conductivity depending on composition only are pointed out. The efficiency of the system is analyzed under the assumption that the optimal energy conversion corresponds to the minimum rate of energy dissipated. The values of composition and temperature which minimize such a rate are calculated as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据