4.7 Article

In-plane impact behavior of 3D-printed auxetic stainless honeycombs

期刊

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
卷 266, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114656

关键词

Re-entrant; Auxetic; Honeycomb; Impactbehaviors; Energyabsorption; 3D-printing; Stainlesssteel

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52178109]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2021SHZDZX0100]
  3. Funda- mental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, drop hammer impact tests and finite element analyses were conducted to investigate the dynamic responses of metallic auxetic honeycombs. The results showed that the auxetic honeycomb specimens had better energy absorption performance, leading to significantly improved energy absorption efficiency.
In order to fully comprehend dynamic responses of metallic auxetic honeycombs, drop hammer impact tests and corresponding finite element (FE) analyses were conducted. The three-dimensional (3D) printing technology was adopted to manufacture stainless steel specimens with varying cell side length-to-thickness ratios and cell configurations. The specimens were crushed under three distinct energy inputs, and the deforming process and relevant mechanical parameters, e.g., the Poisson's ratio, failure mode, plateau stress and energy absorption capacity were studied. The FE results can generally compare well with the experimental ones and facilitate clarifying the impact mechanisms of the experimental results. Improvements of the auxetic specimens in energy absorption were verified through comparison with that of the corresponding convex honeycomb. The results reveal that the specimen with an auxetic honeycomb has higher plateau stress and specific energy absorption with less deformation when the geometric size is the same. A small side length-to-thickness ratio and input impact energy can lead to greatly improved energy absorption efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据