4.7 Article

Deformation and degradation behaviour of Rubber Intermixed Ballast System under cyclic loading

期刊

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
卷 307, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106786

关键词

Tyre derived aggregates; Rubber intermixed ballast; Triaxial test; Cyclic loading; Ballast breakage; Deformation

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [ARC-LP200200915]
  2. ARC Industry Transformation Training Centre for Advanced Rail Track Technologies [IC170100006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper evaluates the characteristics of Rubber Intermixed Ballast System (RIBS) by conducting large-scale triaxial tests with varying rubber contents. The results show that increasing rubber content improves grain configurations, reduces particle deformation, and enhances energy absorption capacity and damping properties.
In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the use of rubber aggregates derived from waste tyres in order to improve track performance, and Rubber Intermixed Ballast System (RIBS) demonstrated some of the important geotechnical properties that reduce ballast deterioration by partially replacing ballast particles using rubber granules ranging from 9.5 to 19.5 mm. This paper focuses on evaluating the characteristics of RIBS subjected to cyclic loads by conducting large-scale triaxial tests for changing rubber contents (0-15% by weight) under confining pressures (30-60 kPa) and a loading frequency of 20 Hz following a monotonic conditioning phase. The results indicate that irreversible rearrangement of grain configurations was pronounced in RIBS with increased rubber at the conditioning phase leading to a reduction in particle deformation during the cyclic loading. It was also demonstrated that the increased rubber content in RIBS increases the energy absorption capacity and damping properties, reduces ballast breakage and resilient modulus. In addition, the study confirmed 10% by weight as the optimum rubber content in RIBS, considering the overall deformation and degradation performance of ballast.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据