4.7 Article

A multi-dimensional feasibility analysis of coal to methanol assisted by green hydrogen from a life cycle viewpoint

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 268, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115992

关键词

Coal to methanol; Green hydrogen; Life cycle assessment; Techno-economic analysis; Renewable energy

资金

  1. Knowledge Innovation Program of Wuhan -Basic Research [2022020801010354]
  2. Joint Fund of the Yulin University
  3. Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy [2021021]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51776133, U1810125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes a coal to methanol process assisted by renewable hydrogen generated from wind, solar, or wind-solar hybrid power. The GH-CTM process shows improved carbon, energy, and exergy efficiency compared to the traditional coal to methanol process. Techno-economic and life cycle assessments also indicate the GH-CTM process's superior economic performance and lower environmental impact.
Incorporating renewable hydrogen (green H2) in the coal to methanol process plays a significant role to achieve the reduction of carbon intensity and improve energy efficiency and economic performance of the coal chemical industry. This study proposed a coal to methanol process assisted by the green hydrogen generated from three pathways of water electrolysis by wind, solar or wind-solar hybrid power (GH-CTM). The GH-CTM process was established, modeled and validated based on the industrial data, and the key operating parameters that have significant effects on the system were investigated and optimized. Additionally, a comparative analysis based on techno-economic evaluation and life cycle assessment of GH-CTM and the traditional coal to methanol (CTM) is investigated. Results show that carbon utilization efficiency (CUE, 68.14 %), hydrogen utilization efficiency (HUE, 75.57 %), energy efficiency (57.16 %) and exergy efficiency (52.48 %) of GH-CTM is 28.91 %, 19.65 %, 3.82 % and 4.03 % superior to that of CTM. Carbon emission intensity (CEI, 1.39 t/t), water consumption (WC, 1.21 t/t), energy consumption of methanol production (ENC, 11.62 MWh/t) of GH-CTM process are 39.83 %, 20.92 % and 6.74 % lower than that of CTM process. GH-CTM processes (GH-CTM-1, GH-CTM-2 and GH-CTM-3) have outstanding economic performance, in which IRR is 5.68-16.33 % greater than that of the CTM process (15.9 %), and CMP is 23.17-39.86 % lower than that of CTM (334.20 $/t). With the same methanol production, the life cycle cost of methanol production (LCCMP, 235.75 $/t), life cycle carbon emission intensity (LCCEI, 1.88 t/t), life cycle water consumption (LCWC, 2.73 t/t) and life cycle energy consumption of methanol production (LCENC, 11.68 MWh/t) of GH-CTM-3 process are 40.26 %, 41.25 %, 35.46 % and 7.0 % lower than that of CTM process, respectively. These findings demonstrate that the GH-CTM process, which converts unstable renewable power into stable methanol molecules and solves the problem of intermittent and inter-seasonal renewable energy utilization, shows good feasibility in terms of the environment, economy, and technique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据