Sustainability of waste-to-hydrogen conversion pathways: A life cycle thinking-based assessment br

Waste-derived hydrogen (H2) has been identified as a clean energy source which could simultaneously abate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and avert municipal solid waste (MSW) from being deposited in perpetual landfills. In this study, four waste-to-hydrogen processes - gasification, pyrolysis, integrated pyrolysisgasification, and landfill bioreactor technology - are studied with MSW as feedstock. Following technological evaluations, life cycle assessment and life cycle costing are performed for different scenarios and configurations to evaluate their environmental footprint, levelized cost of H2, and energy return on investment. Finally, multicriteria decision-making was applied using the VIKOR method under four weighting schemes to evaluate the four processes under varying decision-making contexts. Gasification results in the highest H2 outputs and energy returns, whereas pyrolysis produces the lowest levelized cost due to its biochar by-product formation. Nevertheless, all four technologies proved to be performing optimally under different weightings of environmental, economic, and social elements, suggesting the versatility of the waste-to-hydrogen concept and its suitability to be applied in various decision-making contexts. The results and novelties of this study would contribute toward planning and investment decision-making in sustainable H2 production and clean energy.

Automated summary

This study evaluated and compared four waste-to-hydrogen processes, with gasification producing the highest hydrogen output and pyrolysis having the lowest levelized cost. However, all four technologies performed optimally under different weightings, demonstrating the versatility and applicability of waste-to-hydrogen concept. The results of this study are important for planning and investment decision-making in sustainable hydrogen production and clean energy.