4.7 Article

Climatic impacts on residential natural gas consumption: Evidence from Hefei, China

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 275, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112488

关键词

Climate change adaptation; Residential natural gas consumption; China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China
  2. [72174052]
  3. [71773028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The number of cold days is decreasing due to climate change, but China's natural gas heating users are increasing rapidly. Assessing the impact of natural gas use on climate change is crucial. The study finds that temperature change has a significant impact on gas consumption.
The number of cold days will gradually decrease due to climate change, thus reducing the use of natural gas as it is the primary energy source for winter heating. However, with the improvement of urbanization level and the deepening of the energy revolution, China's natural gas heating users have increased rapidly. Therefore, assessing the impact of residential natural gas use on climate change in China is extre-mely important, whether in terms of migration or adaptation policies. Using bimonthly bill-level data from Hefei residents' gas consumption, this study investigates the impact of temperature change on gas consumption. Specifically, the different effects over the various ratios of wall-mounted boiler heating users are analyzed. On average, when the annual temperature increases by 1 degrees C, the gas consumption is reduced by 2.08 %, for wall-mounted boiler heating users, the impact is even -3.34 %. Considering the increasing of the penetration rate of the gas wall-mounted, the above reduction induced by climate change could be offset-if the penetration rate is higher than 57 %, it could be fully offset. As the critical role of natural gas in China's energy transition, our findings have significant implications for alleviating natural gas supply and energy substitution in China.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据