4.7 Article

Exploring the temporal links between foreign aid, institutional quality, and CO2 emissions for poorer countries

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 270, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112287

关键词

Institutional quality; CO2 emissions; Foreign aid; Causal links

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the temporal causal links between foreign aid, CO2 emissions, and governance institutions in poorer countries, finding complex dynamics in the short run and a Granger-causal relationship between institutional quality, CO2 emissions, and foreign aid in the longer term. The results highlight the need for coordinated policies to address environmental development in these countries.
It is widely acknowledged that poorer countries experience the brunt of deleterious impacts of CO2 emissions and climate change. Deteriorating environmental quality has a negative spillover impact on the health and wellbeing of the economy and individuals in these countries. In this study, we examine whether there are temporal (Granger) causal links between foreign aid (which many developing countries depend on), CO2 emissions, and the quality of the institutions of governance in poorer countries. We use the vector error-correction model (VECM) to study the links. The study was conducted for low-income and lower middle-income countries from 2005 to 2019. Results indicate that there exist complex and varied endogenous dynamics amongst all three variables in the short run. Over the longer period, the results are more uniform: the level of institutional quality and the level of CO2 emissions both Granger-cause foreign aid. Based on the results, the paper outlines key co-development policies on foreign aid, institutional reforms, and CO2 emissions to transition poorer countries onto a path of enhanced environmental development (lower CO2 emission), as envisioned in the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow (COP26) [United Nations, 2021]. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据