4.7 Review

Outlook on the Role of Natural Surfactants on Emulsion Stability and Gas Hydrate Antiagglomeration in Crude Oil Systems

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 36, 期 18, 页码 10732-10750

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c01964

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center for Hydrate Research consortium members

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gas hydrates are a significant issue in oil and gas transportation as they can block flowlines and reduce hydrocarbon production. To mitigate this, surfactant-like molecules are used to prevent the agglomeration of hydrate particles. Some crude oils naturally have anti-agglomeration properties due to the presence of surfactants. Understanding the concentration and interfacial activity of these natural surfactants is crucial in understanding the anti-agglomeration process.
Gas hydrates constitute a major flow assurance issue in the transportation of oil and gas from the reservoir to the point of sale via pipelines. They can reduce or arrest the hydrocarbon production in a short period of time. Gas hydrate mitigation strategies involve the application of surfactant-like molecules able to prevent the agglomeration of hydrate particles and thus reducing their tendency to plug the flowlines. Some crude oils, commonly referred to as nonplugging oils, show a natural hydrate antiagglomerant tendency. This property has been related to crude fractions, such as asphaltenes and acids that naturally behave as surfactants. Given that these natural surfactants play a key role in the stabilization of water-in-crude oil emulsions, it has been practically unavoidable to consider hydrate antiagglomeration as a phenomenon linked to the stability of crude oil emulsions. Although hydrate natural antiagglomeration is a result of complex mechanisms involving crude oil composition, physicochemical conditions of the system, and fluid dynamics, the concentration and interfacial activity of natural surfactants are paramount in understanding the whole antiagglomeration process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据