4.7 Article

Thermodynamic, environmental and economic analyses of photovoltaic/thermal-thermoelectric generator system using single and hybrid particle nanofluids

期刊

ENERGY
卷 255, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124515

关键词

Economic; Energy; Environmental; Exergy; Nanofluid; Photovoltaic; thermal-thermoelectric; generator

资金

  1. Dong-A University research fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, thermodynamic, environmental, and economic analyses were conducted on photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) and photovoltaic/thermal-thermoelectric generator (PV/T-TEG) systems. The results showed that the PV/T-TEG system outperformed the PV/T system, and Al2O3/Cu nanofluid and oblate spheroid-shaped nanoparticles exhibited superior performances in both systems.
In the present study, the thermodynamic, environmental, and economic analyses are conducted on photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) and photovoltaic/thermal-thermoelectric generator (PV/T-TEG) systems. The water, single particle Al(2)O(3 )and hybrid Al2O3/Cu nanofluids with spherical (Sp) and oblate spheroid (OS) shaped nanoparticles are considered as heat transfer fluids in both systems. A transient threedimensional coupled numerical model is developed to investigate the behavior of PV/T and PV/T-TEG systems under the temperature oceanic ambient conditions of Calicut, India. The results reveal that the PV/T-TEG system shows superior performance compared to PV/T system. The energy, exergy, environmental and economic performances are superior for Al2O3/Cu nanofluid followed by Al(2)O(3 )nanofluid and water in decreasing order and those are superior for OS shaped nanoparticles compared to Sp shaped nanoparticles for both systems. The PV/T-TEG system with Al2O3/Cu-OS nanofluid is evaluated as the best configuration with total electrical power, thermal power, electrical and thermal energy efficiencies, electrical and thermal exergy efficiencies, net CO2 mitigation, carbon credit, SOx, NO(x )and PM emission reductions, levelized cost of energy (LCOE), energy payback time and profit of 215.73 W, 170.30 W, 23.89%, 24.86%, 25.19%, 0.305%, 42.53 tons, 1056.90 $, 825.69 kg, 413.23 kg, 86.04 kg, 0.04945 $/kWh, 2.57 years and 15719.07 $, respectively. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据