4.7 Article

Effect of proportions of fins with radial branches on the lauric acid melting process in an annular cavity

期刊

ENERGY
卷 255, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124557

关键词

CFD; Extended surfaces; PCM; Phase change material

资金

  1. Unisinos Office of Research and Graduate Studies (UAPPG) [001-Process: 88887.150631/2017-0 0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes the effect of innovative fin geometry on the melting process of phase change materials in an energy storage system. The results show that the use of fins can significantly enhance the melting rate, and adjusting the proportions and positioning of the fin branches can further optimize the melting process.
Energy storage systems with phase change materials (PCM) are characterized by high energy density, with a low thermal and volumetric variation. However, the usual low thermal conductivity increases energy charging and discharging times. An established solution to enhance heat exchange is the use of fins. The objective of the present work is to analyze the effect of innovative fin geometry on the melting process of Lauric acid PCM in an annular cavity. In the case studies, the fins cross-sectional areas were considered constant, then varying the proportions and positioning of the fin branches for two different area fractions between the fin and cavity. The numerical model, validated with experimental data from reference works, consisted of the continuity, momentum, and energy conservation equations complemented by an enthalpy-porosity phase change model. The results showed that the melting rate effectiveness reached average values up to 146% compared to a finless system. The increase in branches intensified the natural convection while its positioning was decisive for total melting time reduction. Positioning the branches close to the heated inner core or outer cavity wall reduced the melting rate due to the fluid circulation inhibition. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据