4.7 Article

Modelling and statistical analysis of plastic biomass mixture co-gasification

期刊

ENERGY
卷 256, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124638

关键词

Biomass; Plastic; Thermodynamic modelling; Aspen plus; Response surface methodology; Co-gasification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an Aspen Plus model was developed to investigate the thermodynamics of plastic/biomass co-gasification. The results showed that steam co-gasification outperforms air and oxygen-gasified processes in terms of gas composition and lower heating value (LHV). Temperature and steam to fuel ratio were found to be the most influential parameters, affecting hydrogen production, gas yield, and carbon conversion efficiency.
In this work, an Aspen Plus model was developed to study the plastic/biomass co-gasification thermodynamically. Tar inclusion and temperature restricted equilibrium approach were applied for model modification. Using different gasifying agents, it was found that steam co-gasification is superior to air and oxygen-gasified processes in terms of gas composition and lower heating value (LHV). The use of an oxygen/steam mixture enhances H2 production if the steam to fuel ratio (S/F) is kept low. The modelling results were integrated with Response Surface Methodology to study the impacts of temperature (T), steam to fuel ratio (S/F), and plastic to biomass ratio (P/B) and their interactions within the steam cogasification process. It was found that T and S/F, and their interaction, are the most influential parameters. Increasing the T, S/F, and P/B was favourable for enhancing H2 production, gas yield (GY), and carbon conversion efficiency (CCE), while CO content and LHV can be negatively affected. Using ANOVA results, empirical correlations were derived for estimating the responses (H2, CO, CO2, CH4, LHV, GY, and CCE). The optimum condition obtained using the desirability function (DF) approach was T = 921 degrees C, S/ F = 1.186, and P/B = 74.99, at which the overall desirability function was found to be DF = 0.9. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据