4.5 Article

Investigation of Steam Explosion Pretreatment of Sawdust and Oat Straw to Improve Their Quality as Biofuel Pellets

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15197168

关键词

steam explosion; pretreatment; pelletization; sawdust; oat straw; pellet quality

资金

  1. Biofuel Network (BFN) [ASC-16]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2017-05287]
  3. University of Saskatchewan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Steam explosion pretreatment improves the quality of biomass pellets made from sawdust and oat straw. The mechanical properties of the pellets are influenced by temperature, time, and moisture content. The treated biomass has higher heating value and tensile strength, and exhibits a more compact and cemented microstructure.
Steam explosion pretreatment of sawdust and oat straw under mild, medium, and severe conditions was conducted to improve the quality of pellets generated from these feedstocks. This work examined the effects of temperature, time, and moisture content on the mechanical properties of biomass pellets. From the ANOVA conducted, the p-values of the regression models for all the response variables (dimensional stability, tensile strength, and pellet density) studied were significant (p < 0.05), except for the pellet density of steam-pretreated oat straw pellets. The interaction of these three factors did not significantly affect the response variables of oat straw pellets. In addition, the higher heating value (HHV) of treated biomass increased up to a maximum of about 9.5% and 7% as compared with the non-treated sawdust and oat straw, respectively. In addition, an increment of about 3.6-fold and 3.1-fold in pellet tensile strength of steam-pretreated sawdust and oat straw was observed, respectively. Microstructural examination of the pellets from steam-pretreated biomass revealed that the material contained particles that were more closely bonded and featured a cemented surface with fewer pores when compared to particles from untreated oat straw and sawdust.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据