4.5 Review

Planning Sustainable Energy Systems in the Southern African Development Community: A Review of Power Systems Planning Approaches

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15217860

关键词

renewable energy; electricity access; generation expansion planning; low electrification; sustainable energy

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), through the MPP2030 program [PRT/BD/152832/2021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Southern Africa has abundant renewable energy resources, but electricity access remains a major policy issue, and traditional electrification methods have not addressed energy poverty in rural areas. Therefore, off-grid solutions using renewable energy sources should be considered.
Southern Africa has a huge potential for renewable energy sources such as hydro, solar, wind, biomass, and geothermal. However, electricity access remains a key policy issue for most member states, with a global average access to electricity of only 54% in 2019. This low electrification rate is a strong motivation for member states to increase renewable energy use and improve access to electricity for all. The goal of this paper was to present a literature review of methodologies, energy plans, and government programs that have been implemented by the Southern African Development Community member states to address the region's low average electrification rate and greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. The study presents the most commonly used methodologies for the integration of renewable energies into electrical systems, considering the main grid and distributed generation systems. LCOE minimization methodologies and software options, such as GIS, HOMER, LEAP, and EnergyPLAN, are the most common among the identified studies. The traditional method of electrifying by expanding the grid has not contributed to the eradication of energy poverty in rural areas. Therefore, to improve electricity access in Southern Africa, it is essential to consider off-grid solutions based on renewable energy sources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据