Comparison of Traditional Image Segmentation Methods Applied to Thermograms of Power Substation Equipment

The variation in the thermal state of electrical energy substation equipment is normally associated with natural wear or equipment failure. This can be detected by infrared thermography, but technically it demands a long time to analyze these images. Computational analysis can allow an automated, more agile, and more efficient analysis to detect overheated regions in thermographic images. Therefore, it is necessary to segment the region of interest in the images; however, the results may diverge depending on the technique used. Thus, this article presents the improvement of four different techniques implemented in Python and applied in a substation under real operating conditions for a period of eleven months. The performance of the four methods was compared using eight statistical performance measures, and the efficiency was measured by the runtime. The segmentation results showed that the methods based on a threshold (Otsu and Histogram-Based Threshold) were fast, with processing times of 0.11 to 0.24 s, but caused excessive segmentation, presenting the lowest accuracy (0.160 and 0.444) and precision (0.004 and 0.049, respectively). The clustering-based methods (Cluster K-means and Fuzzy C-means) showed similar results to each other but were more accurate (0.936 to 1.000), more precise (0.965 to 1.000), and slower, with 2.55 and 38.8 s, respectively, compared to the threshold methods. The Fuzzy C-means method obtained the highest values of specificity, accuracy, and precision among the methods under analysis, followed by the Cluster K-means method.

Automated summary

This article presents the improvement of four different techniques for segmenting thermographic images of electrical energy substation equipment. The results showed that threshold-based methods were fast but had low accuracy and precision, while clustering-based methods were slower but had higher accuracy and precision. The Fuzzy C-means method had the highest values of specificity, accuracy, and precision among the methods under analysis, followed by the Cluster K-means method.