4.5 Review

Electricity Usage Settlement System Based on a Cryptocurrency Instrument

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15197003

关键词

cryptocurrency; cryptocoin; energy settlements; energy market; blockchain; DLT; prosumer; smart grid; smart contract; electricity user

资金

  1. POB Energy of Warsaw University of Technology within the Excellence Initiative: Research University (IDUB) programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the issue of using cryptocurrencies for an electricity settlement system and presents a blockchain-based solution that aligns with the trends of the transforming power sector. Implementing such a system could be the first step towards introducing a new universal means of value exchange linked to energy.
This article reviews the issue of the use of cryptocurrencies (crypto-assets, in general) for an electricity settlement system. The development of digital techniques, including blockchain-based mechanisms, has meant that an increased interest in blockchain-based solutions is to be expected. Blockchain and similar approaches are characterised by decentralisation, so they are concurrent with the trends of the transforming power sector. Decentralised energy generation based on a high proportion of prosumer installations requires the implementation of a new settlement system for grid activities related to electricity use. The first projects of such systems based on a dedicated cryptocurrency have emerged. Based on these, the general concept of such a system with its own cryptocurrency called CCE is presented, including variants implementing net-metering and net-billing. Furthermore, issues requiring interdisciplinary research work and discussion before implementing such systems were identified. A settlement system in which a cryptocurrency is linked to a unit of energy used could be a first step towards introducing a new universal means of value exchange, linked to energy as the primary measure of the value of goods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据