4.5 Article

Capacitance Temperature Dependence Analysis of GaN-on-Si Power Transistors

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15197062

关键词

power electronics; wide bandgap; gallium nitride; capacitance; traps; TCAD

资金

  1. French Public Authorities within PSPC French national program G-Mobility [DOS0134974]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the temperature dependence of GaN-on-Si power transistors, particularly focusing on the depletion voltage caused by progressive depletion of the 2DEG under device field plates. The study examines variations in epitaxial growth and analyzes the origin of the deep acceptor trap responsible for the temperature dependence. By adjusting TCAD parameters and comparing with existing literature, the origin is determined to be a gallium vacancy tied to oxygen atom(s) on the N site.
Many kinds of defects are present in the different layers of GaN-on-Si epitaxy. Their study is very important, especially because they play a significant role on the device characteristics. This paper investigates the cause of the temperature dependence of the output and Miller capacitance at three temperatures: 25 degrees C, 75 degrees C and 150 degrees C of GaN-on-Si power transistors. In particular, this study focuses on the temperature dependence of the depletion voltage seen in these characteristics due to the progressive depletion of the two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) under the device field plates. First, variations of the epitaxial growth are studied, showing that the intrinsic carbon concentration does not play a significant role. Secondly, the deep acceptor trap origin of the temperature dependence is analyzed with a TCAD simulation study. Thirdly, by adjusting TCAD parameters and binding them with experimental concentrations to fit experimental data, trap properties were obtained. The comparison of these properties with the acceptor traps in the literature suggests that the origin is a gallium vacancy tied to oxygen atom(s) on the N site.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据