4.7 Article

CIP2A deficiency promotes depression-like behaviors in mice through inhibition of dendritic arborization

期刊

EMBO REPORTS
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embr.202254911

关键词

AKT; CIP2A; dendritic arborization; depression; PP2A

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31970964, 82171426, 31900685]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study discovers a novel mechanism in which CIP2A deficiency promotes depression through the regulation of PP2A-AKT signaling and dendritic arborization. The study also finds decreased expression of CIP2A in a mouse model of chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) and in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a severe mental illness. Decreased brain plasticity and dendritic fields have been consistently found in MDD patients and animal models; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain to be clarified. Here, we demonstrate that the deletion of cancerous inhibitor of PP2A (CIP2A), an endogenous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), leads to depression-like behaviors in mice. Hippocampal RNA sequencing analysis of CIP2A knockout mice shows alterations in the PI3K-AKT pathway and central nervous system development. In primary neurons, CIP2A stimulates AKT activity and promotes dendritic development. Further analysis reveals that the effect of CIP2A in promoting dendritic development is dependent on PP2A-AKT signaling. In vivo, CIP2A deficiency-induced depression-like behaviors and impaired dendritic arborization are rescued by AKT activation. Decreased CIP2A expression and impaired dendrite branching are observed in a mouse model of chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS). Indicative of clinical relevance to humans, CIP2A expression is found decreased in transcriptomes from MDD patients. In conclusion, we discover a novel mechanism that CIP2A deficiency promotes depression through the regulation of PP2A-AKT signaling and dendritic arborization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据