4.6 Article

Development of a quasi-on-time ICP-OES for analyzing electrode reaction products

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 433, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141246

关键词

ICP-OES; Numerical calculation; Hydrodynamic voltammetry; On-line analysis

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [21J20538]
  2. Innovative Structural Materials R & D Project of the New Energy and industrial technology Development Organization (NEDO) , Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A quasi-on-time system for analyzing electrode reaction products is developed by combining ICP-OES with a hydrodynamic electrochemical technique. The shorter the distance between the electrode end and the OES detector, the shorter the time response and the higher the detection efficiency (98.1%). Application of this system to analyze reaction species generated from a Cu electrode in a chloride-containing solution demonstrates the effective inhibition of Cu dissolution by adding BTA above a critical concentration of 10 mol m-3.
A quasi-on-time system for analyzing electrode reaction products was developed by combining inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) with a hydrodynamic electrochemical technique. Numerical calculations and experiments showed that the shorter the distance of the withdrawing flow channel from the electrode end to the OES detector, the shorter the time response and the detection efficiency is 98.1%, which enables the transient determination of the generation rate for products. Application of the combined system with sufficient time resolution to the analysis of reaction species generated from a Cu electrode in a chloridecontaining aqueous solution showed that the addition of benzotriazole (BTA) above a critical concentration of 10 mol m-3 is effective in inhibiting the dissolution of Cu. The development of the quasi-on-time system of analysis would enable application to a wide range of non-steady-state electrochemical reactions including corrosion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据