4.6 Article

Hybrid microwave annealing assisted synthesis of MoS2-RGO nanostructures: Optimization and characterization for application in supercapacitors

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 426, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.140738

关键词

Molybdenum disulfide; Reduced graphene oxide; Cyclic voltammetry; Galvanostatic charge -discharge; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, India [03 (1469) /19/EMR-II]
  2. [LPU/DRDSEED/SAC/65]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the superior performance of MoS2-RGO nanostructure as an electrode material for supercapacitors through synthesis, characterization, and performance testing.
The feasible solution to overcome the mismatch between the world's energy demand and supply can be the development of appropriate charge-storing devices like batteries and supercapacitors. In the present work, an attempt has been made to design an efficient supercapacitor electrode material by employing the synergistic effects of Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO). A time saving hybrid microwave assisted annealing technique has been used to synthesize MoS2-RGO based nanostructures with varying composition of RGO i.e. 5, 10, 15 and 20%. FESEM, XRD and Raman spectroscopy have been employed to study the surface morphology and structure of the synthesized nanomaterial. The candidature of the MoS2-RGO nanostructures for the electrode material of supercapacitor has been justified by using cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). A magnificent performance like specific capacity of 429.67 Cg-1 (1023 Fg- 1) at a current density of 1 Ag-1 and a decent retention of 82% after 1000 cycles, even at the higher current density i.e. 5Ag-1, was displayed by the MoS2-RGO (10%) nanostructure based electrode. The correlating results of voltammetric and EIS studies are reported and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据