4.6 Article

Electrochemically active biofilm-enabled biosensors: Current status and opportunities for biofilm engineering

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 428, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.140917

关键词

Electrochemically active biofilm (EAB); EAB-enabled biosensors; Biofilm engineering; Microbial fuel cell

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0901303]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC91851211, 41772363]
  3. National Research Foundation
  4. MOE Singapore [M4330005.C70]
  5. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemically active biofilms (EABs) are formed by electroactive bacteria that can exchange electrons with electrodes. They have been widely used in bioelectrochemical sensors. However, the sensitivity, specificity, and stability of EAB-enabled biosensors are still limited. Therefore, engineering EABs is an effective strategy to improve their performance.
Electrochemically active biofilms (EABs) are formed by electroactive bacteria capable of exchanging electrons with electrodes. EABs have been employed as bio-elements in bioelectrochemical sensors which sense analytes of interest by converting metabolic changes to easily detectable electrical signals. Although EAB-enabled biosensors have shown promise in environmental applications, such as water quality monitoring, their most perceived practical applications are limited by low sensitivity, low specificity and short-term stability. Engineering EABs could be an effective strategy to improve the performance of EAB-enabled biosensors. In this review, we briefly introduce EAB with the focus on its extracellular electron transfer, development and matrix, as well as EAB-enabled biosensors including their general principle and potential applications. We then discuss key limita-tions of EAB-enabled biosensors and the opportunities that biofilm engineering may provide to address these limitations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据