4.6 Article

Comparative study of battery-based STATCOM in grid-following and grid-forming modes for stabilization of offshore wind power plant

期刊

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108449

关键词

Grid-following; Grid-forming; STATCOM; Small-signal stability; Wind power plant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a comparative analysis of a static synchronous compensator (STATCOM) based on battery energy storage system for stability enhancement of offshore wind power plants. The results show that the grid-forming control offers evident stability margin and damping to the WPPs, especially in weak grids, superior to the grid-following STATCOM. The small-signal models and comparative analysis are validated through electromagnetic transients simulations.
This paper presents a comparative analysis of a static synchronous compensator (STATCOM) based on battery energy storage system with grid-following and grid-forming operations utilized for stability enhancement of offshore wind power plants (WPPs). The small-signal model of a typical offshore WPP system is developed first, then compared from two perspectives - oscillation index for stability margin evaluation of a multi-input multi-output system and damping ratio of dominant poles, with respect to the critical control parameters. The theoretical comparative analysis proves that the grid-forming control offers evident stability margin and damping to the WPPs especially in weak grids, superior to the grid-following STATCOM. This conclusion holds true for most conditions with properly designed parameters, including different bandwidths of the alternating voltage control of STATCOM in 1 similar to 10 Hz and phase-locked loop of grid-following STATCOM ranging from 5 to 100 Hz, which is benefited from the sufficient stability margin of GFM mode. The small-signal models and comparative analysis are corroborated by electromagnetic transients (EMT) simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据