4.7 Article

Multiple trace elements exposure of Grey-cheeked Fulvettas Alcippe morrisonia, a nuclear member in bird mixed-species flocks, and implications for bioindicator

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114063

关键词

Trace elements; Passerines; Feathers; Biological indicators; Bioaccumulation; Lead-Zinc Mining

资金

  1. Key Grant of Guangxi Nature and Science Foundation
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. [2018GXNSFDA281016]
  4. [31870370]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Birds are vulnerable to metal pollution, and can serve as indicators of environmental safety monitoring. This study evaluated trace elements in living and deceased Grey-cheeked Fulvettas at a highly polluted mine tailings and a reference site, finding higher metal concentrations in feathers at the mine site, particularly Cd and Pb. Feathers of Grey-cheeked Fulvettas may be useful bioindicators for local metal contamination assessment.
Birds are vulnerable to metal pollution, which can serve as indicators of environmental safety monitoring. In this study, we evaluated three non-essential (Pb, Cd, and As) and two essential (Cu and Zn) trace elements of living (only feathers) and deceased (feathers and tissues) Grey-cheeked Fulvetta (Alcippe morrisonia) at a highly polluted mine tailings and a reference site. Five metal concentrations in the feathers of living Grey-cheeked Fulvettas were higher at the mine site. Among these, the levels of Cd and Pb in most feathers exceeded the threshold, resulting in an ecotoxicological concern. The correlation analysis suggested that feathers from Grey-cheeked Fulvettas might be useful bioindicators for local metal contamination assessment. The toxicological effects of trace metals on Grey-cheeked Fulvetta might affect its leadership ability. Therefore, understanding the effects of metal pollution on Grey-cheeked Fulvetta would show important practical implications for the con-servation of bird communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据