4.7 Article

Divergent dynamics between grassland greenness and gross primary productivity across China

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109100

关键词

Grassland dynamics; Gross primary productivity; Normalized difference vegetation index; Change consistency; China

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0604704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is inconsistency between grassland greenness and productivity in China, with the relative increase rate of productivity higher than that of greenness. Temperature and precipitation are the main contributing factors to grassland growth change.
Grassland, the most widespread vegetation type in China, has been greening recently. However, the extent to which the greenness has been translated into productivity and the underlying mechanism of the decoupled grassland greenness and productivity remains unclear. In this study, we detected the trend of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and gross primary productivity (GPP) of grassland in China from 2000 to 2019 and analyzed the driving mechanism of the inconsistency between them. It was found that the relative increase rate of productivity (27.27%, p < 0.05) was much greater than that of greenness (14.54%, p < 0.05) across grasslands in China from 2000 to 2019, especially in temperate regions. The temperature and precipitation were the main factors influencing the grassland growth change, and the impact of temperature and shortwave radiation on productivity was greater than on greenness. However, the increase of grassland greenness was not fully translated into productivity in subtropical and tropical grass as well as shrub. This study revealed the dominance of climatic factors in the translation process from ecosystem structure to function, which highlighted the challenge in enhancing carbon uptake capacity of terrestrial ecosystem facing accelerated climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据