4.7 Article

Estimating residents' WTP for ecosystem services improvement in a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program: A choice experiment approach

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107561

关键词

Ecosystem services; Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES); Non-market valuation; Choice experiment

资金

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture/USDA [2018-67020-27854]
  2. South Carolina Natural Resources Conservation Service [NR184639XXXXG002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the feasibility of establishing a Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) by estimating the potential community benefits from ecosystem services (ES) improvement. The findings revealed varying willingness-to-pay estimates depending on the type of intervention, regional location, and priority ES for improvement. Overall, the community benefits are estimated to reach $4.6 million to $6.2 million monthly, showing that PES is a promising program that could provide substantial support to conservation programs.
Conservation programs help mitigate the detrimental effects on ecosystems and ecosystem services (ES). However, continuous financial support is essential for their sustainability. Therefore, sustainable financing mechanisms such as Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) are developed. Nevertheless, assessing whether substantial support could be obtained from stakeholders is critical in establishing a PES. This study evaluated the feasibility of establishing a PES by estimating the potential community benefits from ES improvement using a choice modeling approach. The study surveyed 1560 residents of South Carolina to elicit their monthly willingness-to-pay (WTP) for ES improvement. The findings revealed varying WTP estimates depending on the type of intervention, regional location of the residences, and priority ES for improvement. In terms of water quality improvement, the estimated mean WTP ranged from $0 to $3.00. On the other hand, for wildlife habitat improvement, the mean WTP ranged from $0 to $6.39. Finally, for an increase in water supply, only residents from the Upstate region indicated that they are willing with a mean WTP of $0.31. Overall, the community benefits are estimated to reach $4.6 million to $6.2 million monthly, showing that PES is a promising program that could provide a substantial source to support conservation programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据