4.7 Article

Epochs, events and episodes: Marking the geological impact of humans

期刊

EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 234, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104171

关键词

Anthropocene; Anthropogenic modification episode; chronostratigraphy; Great Acceleration Event Array

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Event stratigraphy is used to identify the Anthropocene by categorizing distinct events, with the Great Acceleration Event Array (GAEA) being the most notable. The GAEA represents a significant transition in the Earth System, indicating the base of the Anthropocene as a new geological epoch.
Event stratigraphy is used to help characterise the Anthropocene as a chronostratigraphic concept, based on analogous deep-time events, for which we provide a novel categorization. Events in stratigraphy are distinct from extensive, time-transgressive 'episodes' - such as the global, highly diachronous record of anthropogenic change, termed here an Anthropogenic Modification Episode (AME). Nested within the AME are many geologically correlatable events, the most notable being those of the Great Acceleration Event Array (GAEA). This isochronous array of anthropogenic signals represents brief, unique events evident in geological deposits, e.g.: onset of the radionuclide 'bomb-spike'; appearance of novel organic chemicals and fuel ash particles; marked changes in patterns of sedimentary deposition, heavy metal contents and carbon/nitrogen isotopic ratios; and ecosystem changes leaving a global fossil record; all around the mid-20th century. The GAEA reflects a fundamental tran-sition of the Earth System to a new state in which many parameters now lie beyond the range of Holocene variability. Globally near-instantaneous events can provide robust primary guides for chronostratigraphic boundaries. Given the intensity, magnitude, planetary significance and global isochroneity of the GAEA, it provides a suitable level for recognition of the base of the Anthropocene as a series/epoch.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据