4.7 Article

Along-strike distribution of seismicity and large slow slip correlated with gravity at the Nankai Trough

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 598, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117824

关键词

slow slip; intraplate earthquakes; slow earthquakes; gravity anomaly; subduction zone; along-strike heterogeneity

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [JP16H06477, JP19K04036, JP21H05205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the occurrence of various earthquakes and slow slip phenomena in subduction zones. It is found that regions with high background seismicity correspond to the source areas of large slow slip events, which are not associated with tectonic tremors. Furthermore, these regions also coincide with areas of low free-air gravity anomalies. This suggests that widespread stress perturbations, possibly coupled with pore fluid effects, control seismic and aseismic slip on subduction faults.
Various earthquakes and slow slip phenomena occur in different locations in the down-dip direction at subduction zones, for example, at the Nankai Trough, Japan. Many earthquakes, tectonic tremors, and slow slip events have occurred on the deeper side of the source areas of the past megathrust earthquakes. We show that three regions with high background seismicity correspond to the source areas of the large (> equivalent moment magnitude 6.5) slow slip events. These regions do not correspond to active areas of tectonic tremors. We note that considering broad-scale variations along the strike of the subduction zone, the three regions also correspond to areas with low free-air gravity anomalies. This fact implies that widespread stress perturbations in the along-strike direction, possibly coupled with pore fluid effects, may control the occurrence of seismic and aseismic slip on subduction faults regardless of whether at the plate interface or within the plate.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据