4.5 Article

Combined effect of acoustic field and gas absorption on evaporation of slurry droplet

期刊

DRYING TECHNOLOGY
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 767-782

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2022.2116583

关键词

Slurry droplet; acoustic levitation; droplet evaporation; gas absorption; heat and mass transfer; acoustic streaming

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a model to investigate the convective heat and mass transfer of an acoustically levitated slurry droplet that evaporates in an atmosphere containing air, water vapor, and soluble gas. The model considered various factors such as acoustic streaming, forced convection, and non-isothermal gas absorption. The results showed that the formation time of a porous shell decreased with increasing sound pressure level (SPL) and increased with increasing frequency.
In this study, we developed a model of convective heat and mass transfer of an acoustically levitated slurry droplet that evaporates in an atmosphere of air, water vapor, and soluble gas. The advanced model considered the effects of acoustic streaming, forced convection, and non-isothermal gas absorption on the evaporation rate of a liquid droplet containing small solid particles. It is shown that the time of porous shell formation decreases with the increase of sound pressure level (SPL) and increases with the increase in frequency. Adding soluble gas to the gaseous phase shortens the time required for porous shell formation during slurry droplet drying. As shown by numerical calculations, in a gas mixture containing air with an ammonia content of 30%, at a temperature of 293 K and a humidity of 50%, with an acoustic field frequency of 2 pi center dot 45 kHz and an SPL of 140 dB, the time of porous shell formation of a silica-water slurry droplet with the initial radius of 250 mu m is about half shorter than that in a gas mixture not containing an active gas. The prediction of the developed model was in good agreement with the experimental results available in literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据