4.6 Article

Safety of Apremilast in Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: Findings from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink

期刊

DRUG SAFETY
卷 45, 期 11, 页码 1403-1411

出版社

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-022-01235-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Amgen Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the incidence rates of adverse events in patients receiving apremilast with those receiving other systemic treatments for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis. The results showed that there were no new safety signals identified in the apremilast-exposed cohort. The incidence rates of adverse events were comparable between the apremilast and non-apremilast cohorts, indicating that the long-term safety of apremilast in real-world settings is similar to that reported in clinical trials.
Introduction This real-world safety analysis was requested by the European Medicines Agency following approval of apremilast, an oral treatment for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis. Objective We aimed to compare incidence rates of adverse events of special interest identified a priori, in patients receiving apremilast with those receiving other systemic treatments for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis. Methods This 5-year cohort study was conducted in Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD between January 2015 and June 2020. Incidence rates of adverse events of special interest were estimated for four matched cohorts: apremilast-exposed and three matched non-apremilast cohorts (oral only, injectable only, and oral and injectable psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis treatments). Results The apremilast-exposed cohort included 341 patients and the three non-apremilast cohorts included 4981 patients. There were no incident cases of vasculitis, hematologic malignancy, non-melanoma skin malignancy, treated depression, treated anxiety, or suicidal behaviors in the apremilast-exposed cohort during the follow-up. Similar incidence rates of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac events, tachyarrhythmias, and solid malignancies were recorded in the apremilast and non-apremilast cohorts. The incidence rate (95% confidence interval) per 1000 person-years of opportunistic and serious infections in the apremilast-exposed cohort (64 [40-102])) was similar to incidence rates in the oral (50 [42-60]) and oral and injectable non-apremilast cohorts (57 [47-69]), while the incidence rates were lower in the injectable treatment-only cohort (20 [10-41]). Limitations include small numbers of apremilast-exposed patients and potential exposure misclassification partly owing to missing information on biologic and other specialty treatment use. Conclusions No new apremilast safety signals were identified in this study. These results provide evidence that the long-term safety of apremilast in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in a real-world setting is comparable to that reported in clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据