4.5 Article

Context matters - Daxx and Atrx are not robust tumor suppressors in the murine endocrine pancreas

期刊

DISEASE MODELS & MECHANISMS
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dmm.049552

关键词

Daxx; Atrx; Men1; Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; Mouse model

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [R21 CA208463]
  2. Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Foundation
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  4. Cancer Center Support Grant from the National Cancer Institute [CA016672]
  5. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  6. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center core

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that Daxx and Atrx are not effective tumor suppressors in the endocrine pancreas of mice, and emphasizes the importance of the genomic context for tumorigenesis.
Genome sequencing has revealed the importance of epigenetic regulators in tumorigenesis. The genes encoding the chromatin remodeling complex DAXX:ATRX are frequently mutated in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; however, the underlying mechanisms of how mutations contribute to tumorigenesis are only partially understood, in part because of the lack of relevant preclinical models. Here, we used genetically engineered mouse models combined with environmental stress to evaluate the tumor suppressor functions of Daxx and Atrx in the mouse pancreas. Daxx or Atrx loss, alone or in combination with Men1 loss, did not drive or accelerate pancreatic neuroendocrine tumorigenesis. Moreover, Daxx loss did not cooperate with environmental stresses (ionizing radiation or pancreatitis) or with the loss of other tumor suppressors (Pten or p53) to promote pancreatic neuroendocrine tumorigenesis. However, owing to promiscuity of the Cre promoter used, hepatocellular carcinomas and osteosarcomas were observed in some instances. Overall, our findings suggest that Daxx and Atrx are not robust tumor suppressors in the endocrine pancreas of mice and indicate that the context of a human genome is essential for tumorigenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据