4.6 Article

Latent energy preserving embedding for unsupervised feature selection

期刊

DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2022.103794

关键词

Feature selection; Energy preserving; Graph regularization; Self-representation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Founda-tion of China
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. [61703360]
  4. [2242021k30014]
  5. [2242021k30059]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Feature selection is a fundamental and challenging topic in machine learning and pattern recognition, and unsupervised feature selection methods have received extensive attention. In this article, a novel latent energy preserving embedding method is proposed for unsupervised feature selection, which utilizes self-representation learning strategy and graph Laplacian for mining manifold information and selects features using l(2,1)-norm. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
As is a fundamental yet challenging topic in machine learning and pattern recognition, feature selection has received much attention. Since data are often unlabeled in real-world applications, unsupervised feature selection (UFS) methods have aroused extensive attention. In this article, we present a novel latent energy preserving embedding (LEPE) method for UFS. First, we rewrite subspace learning into the form of energy preserving. Then, a novel self-representation learning strategy is utilized in the feature selection framework, in which the low-rank and sparse constraints are imposed on the representation matrix. In addition, we utilize a graph Laplacian to mine the manifold information of data. Meanwhile, we use an l(2,1)-norm for feature selection. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed LEPE method, we conduct extensive experiments on six real-world datasets. Experimental results illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据