4.4 Article

Milder progressive cerebellar atrophy caused by biallelic SEPSECS mutations

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 61, 期 6, 页码 527-531

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2016.9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [14525125, 13802019, 11105137, 27280301]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [24118007]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [25293085, 25293235, 13313587, 26670505, 26860816]
  4. fund for Creation of Innovation Centers for Advanced Interdisciplinary Research Areas Program in the Project for Developing Innovation Systems from the Japan Science and Technology Agency [11105305]
  5. Takeda Science Foundation
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26860816, 24118007, 16H05357] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cerebellar atrophy is recognized in various types of childhood neurological disorders with clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Genetic analyses such as whole exome sequencing are useful for elucidating the genetic basis of these conditions. Pathological recessive mutations in Sep (O-phosphoserine) tRNA: Sec (selenocysteine) tRNA synthase (SEPSECS) have been reported in a total of 11 patients with pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 2, progressive cerebellocerebral atrophy or progressive encephalopathy, yet detailed clinical features are limited to only four patients. We identified two new families with progressive cerebellar atrophy, and by whole exome sequencing detected biallelic SEPSECS mutations: c.356A>G (p.Asn119Ser) and c.77delG (p.Arg26Profs*42) in family 1, and c.356A>G (p.Asn119Ser) and c.467G>A (p.Arg156Gln) in family 2. Their development was slightly delayed regardless of normal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in infancy. The progression of clinical symptoms in these families is evidently slower than in previously reported cases, and the cerebellar atrophy milder by brain MRI, indicating that SEPSECS mutations are also involved in milder late-onset cerebellar atrophy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据