4.5 Article

Benign liver lesions 2022: Guideline for clinical practice of Associazione Italiana Studio del Fegato (AISF)

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 54, 期 12, 页码 1614-1622

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.08.031

关键词

Focal liver lesion; Focal nodular hyperplasia; Hepatic hemangioma; Hepatocellular adenoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Benign liver lesions, including hepatic cysts and solid benign tumors, have different prevalence, clinical relevance, symptoms, and natural history. Updated guidelines for their diagnosis and clinical management have been drafted, emphasizing evidence-based clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic approaches. This article presents the second part of the guideline, focusing on the diagnosis and management of hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hepatocellular adenoma.
Benign liver lesions are increasingly diagnosed in daily clinical practice due to the growing use of imaging techniques for the study of the abdomen in patients who have non-specific symptoms and do not have an increased risk of hepatic malignancy. They include simple or parasitic hepatic cysts and solid benign tumors which differ widely in terms of prevalence, clinical relevance, symptoms and natural history and often lead to significant clinical problems relating to diagnosis and clinical management. Following the need to have updated guidelines on the management of benign focal liver lesions, the Scientific Societies mainly involved in their management have promoted the drafting of a new dedicated document. This document was drawn up according to the present Italian rules and methodologies necessary to produce clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic guidelines based on evidence. Here we present the second part of the guideline, concerning the diagnosis and clinical management of hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hepatocellular adenoma. (c) 2022 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据