4.6 Article

Novel visible light driven crystalline carbon nitride-tungsten oxide composites for photodegradation of phenol

期刊

DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS
卷 128, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2022.109246

关键词

Crystalline carbon nitride; Tungsten oxide; Heptazine; Phenol; Photodegradation

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE), Malaysia
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia [Q. J130000.3554.07G57]
  3. UTM [04E39]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of new tungsten oxide modified heptazine-based crystalline carbon nitride composite materials were successfully synthesized, and their excellent photocatalytic performance was confirmed.
A series of new tungsten oxide modified heptazine-based crystalline carbon nitride (CCN-(x)WO3) composite materials with different W loading amount (x = 0.1-1.0 wt%) were successfully synthesized via modified ionothermal and wet impregnation methods. The XRD and FTIR analyses results of confirmed the presence of highly ordered heptazine unit and CN terminal of CCN framework in the synthesized CCN-WO3 composites. The introduction of more WO3 has shifted the optical property of the CCN-WO3 composites to higher wavelength. The TEM and FESEM analyses on CCN-WO3 revealed the presence of WO3 in needle like shape decorated on the surface of CCN. Among, material CCN-(0.25)WO3 has exhibited the highest photocatalytic degradation of phenol which was 1.5 and 15 times higher than bare CCN and WO3 within 6 h exposure of visible light, respectively. The synergistic effect by co-existence of CCN and WO3 has induced the formation of highly ordered hepatize subunit of CCN, broadening light absorption in visible region, high surface area, low electron-hole recombination and high electron-transfer rate constant, which in turn enhanced the photocatalytic performance of CCN-WO3. The radical scavenger studies confirmed that the synthesized CCN-WO3 composite was an excellent visible light driven photocatalyst for phenol degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据