4.3 Article

Evaluation of independent self-collected blood specimens for COVID-19 antibody detection among the US veteran population

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115770

关键词

Capillary blood collection; COVID-19; Antibody; Veterans; Million Veteran Program

资金

  1. Million Veteran Program, Office of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration [MVP000, MVP035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study tested the feasibility of home blood sample collection methods to determine COVID-19 infection or vaccination status. Participants were randomly assigned to use two different devices and rated their experience. The Abbott assay showed the highest sensitivity in detecting known COVID infection and/or vaccination.
Feasibility of home blood sample collection methods for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies from VA Million Veteran Program (MVP) participants was tested to determine COVID-19 infection or vaccination status. Participants (n = 312) were randomly assigned to self-collect blood specimens using the Neoteryx Mitra Clamshell (n = 136) or Tasso-SST (n = 176) and asked to rate their experience. Mitra tip blood was eluted and Tasso tubes were centrifuged. All samples were stored at -80 degrees C until tested with InBios SCoV-2 DetectTM IgG ELISA, BioRad Platelia SARS-CoV-2 Total Ab Assay, Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG and AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assays. Participants rated both devices equally. The Abbott assay had the highest sensitivity (87% Mitra, 98% Tasso-SST) for detecting known COVID infection and/or vaccination. The InBios assay with Tasso-SST had the best sensitivity (97%) and specificity (80%) for detecting known COVID-19 infection and/or vaccination. Veterans successfully collected their own specimens with no strong preference for either device. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据