4.7 Review

Ketones: the double-edged sword of SGLT2 inhibitors?

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 66, 期 1, 页码 23-32

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-022-05815-1

关键词

Cardiovascular; Diabetes; Ketoacidosis; Ketones; Renal; Review; SGLT2 inhibitor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a class of medications used to treat type 2 diabetes by targeting glucose transport in the kidney. In addition to improving blood glucose levels and reducing weight and blood pressure, SGLT2 inhibitors also improve cardiovascular and kidney outcomes, although the underlying mechanisms are still unclear.
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a class of medications used by individuals with type 2 diabetes that reduce hyperglycaemia by targeting glucose transport in the kidney, preventing its reabsorption, thereby inducing glucosuria. Besides improving HbA(1c) and reducing body weight and blood pressure, the SGLT2 inhibitors have also been demonstrated to improve cardiovascular and kidney outcomes, an effect largely independent of their effect on blood glucose levels. Indeed, the mechanisms underlying these benefits remain elusive. Treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors has been found to modestly increase systemic ketone levels. Ketone bodies are an ancillary fuel source substituting for glucose in some tissues and may also possess intrinsic anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory effects. Some have proposed that ketones may in fact mediate the cardio-renal benefits of this drug category. However, a rare complication of SGLT2 inhibition is ketoacidosis, sometimes with normal or near-normal blood glucose concentrations, albeit occurring more frequently in patients with type 1 diabetes who are treated (predominately off-label) with one of these agents. We herein explore the notion that an underpinning of one of the more serious adverse effects of SGLT2 inhibitors may, in fact, explain, at least in part, some of their benefits-a potential 'double-edged sword' of this novel drug category.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据