4.7 Article

Laminin 511 and WNT signalling sustain prolonged expansion of hiPSC-derived hippocampal progenitors

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 149, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.200353

关键词

Hippocampus; Neurogenesis; Neural progenitor cell; WNT; Notch; hiPSC; Neurogenetic niche; Cell transplantation; Zbtb20; Laminin 511

资金

  1. European Commission [603191, 732678]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By re-activating WNT signalling and using specific laminin isoforms, neural progenitor cells with a gene expression profile resembling human embryonic DG cells can be cultured in vitro. These cells play a crucial role in prolonging the neural stem state and extending progenitor cell proliferation, while laminin 511 signalling maintains their capability to undergo hippocampal neurogenesis.
Using the timely re-activation of WNT signalling in neuralizing human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), we have produced neural progenitor cells with a gene expression profile typical of human embryonic dentate gyrus (DG) cells. Notably, in addition to continuous WNT signalling, a specific laminin isoform is crucial to prolonging the neural stem state and to extending progenitor cell proliferation for over 200 days in vitro. Laminin 511 is indeed specifically required to support proliferation and to inhibit differentiation of hippocampal progenitor cells for extended time periods when compared with a number of different laminin isoforms assayed. Global gene expression profiles of these cells suggest that a niche of laminin 511 and WNT signalling is sufficient to maintain their capability to undergo typical hippocampal neurogenesis. Moreover, laminin 511 signalling sustains the expression of a set of genes responsible for the maintenance of a hippocampal neurogenic niche. Finally, xenograft of human DG progenitors into the DG of adult immunosuppressed host mice produces efficient integration of neurons that innervate CA3 layer cells spanning the same area of endogenous hippocampal neuron synapses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据